AFC Women's Asian Cup 2026: Poor performance & other talking points from India vs Japan
Heavy defeat for India as Japan run riot at the AFC Women’s Asian Cup 2026
India suffered an embarrassing 0–11 defeat against Japan in the AFC Women’s Asian Cup 2026, in a match where the Blue Tigresses barely found their footing.
Japan dominated from start to finish, turning the contest into what looked more like a training session as they toyed with the Indian defense throughout the game.
It was a devastating night for India, as the heavy loss significantly impacts their hopes of progressing further in the tournament and pushes their Women’s World Cup dream further away.
The result also marks a painful setback under head coach Amelia Valverde, with the team unable to cope with Japan’s pace, movement, and clinical finishing.
With little going their way on the night, India will now have to quickly regroup and shift focus to their upcoming clash against Chinese Taipei, hoping to respond with a far better performance.
After a night to forget for the Blue Tigresses, here are the key talking points from the match.
Starting XI confusions
India’s team selection raised several questions even before kickoff, with a few surprising calls in the starting XI. The balance of the lineup looked uncertain, and the team struggled to settle into any clear structure from the very beginning.
Some players appeared to be played out of their natural positions, while there was little clarity regarding individual roles on the pitch.
At times, multiple players occupying similar positions were fielded together, which only added to the confusion in India’s shape and movement.
This lack of tactical clarity made it difficult for the side to build rhythm and maintain organization against a well-drilled Japanese team.
Another major talking point was the decision to leave out players who impressed in the previous match. Sanfida Nongrum and Rimpa Haldar, who brought energy and attacking intent in the last game, did not start the match.
Meanwhile, the decision to start Sanju Yadav raised eyebrows, especially after she looked off the pace in the previous outing. The selection choices ultimately added to the questions surrounding India’s approach to such a crucial game.
Pragmatic approach
India opted for a pragmatic setup with three centre-backs, but the cautious approach taken by head coach Amelia Valverde ultimately proved ineffective.
While Japan were always the clear favorites going into the match, India’s overly defensive structure failed to provide stability at the back and also limited their ability to move forward.
With the difference in quality already evident, a more optimistic and courageous approach might have served India better. Instead of sitting too deep and absorbing pressure, India could have looked to be braver on the ball and more proactive in attack.
However, the conservative setup allowed Japan to dominate possession and dictate the tempo with ease, leaving India constantly on the back foot throughout the game.
India’s lack of strong pre-season opposition was visible as they looked nervous against Japan
India’s preparation for the tournament also comes under question after the heavy defeat. In the lead-up to the competition, India faced opponents in the preseason who were nowhere close to Japan’s level in terms of quality and intensity.
That gap became very evident on the pitch, as the players looked nervous and struggled to cope with the speed and sharpness of the Japanese side.
There appeared to be a clear sense of hesitation and inferiority in the way India approached the game, with the team rarely able to impose themselves or play with confidence.
The performance inevitably raises difficult questions about the team’s preparation and the kind of opposition they faced before the tournament.
It also brings attention to the role of the All-India Football Federation.
Clear gap in physicality between India and Japan
India were not only outplayed technically but were also second best in terms of physicality throughout the match. The Japanese players looked sharper, quicker to the ball, and far more comfortable in high-intensity situations.
In almost every duel, whether it was pressing situations or recovery runs, Japan seemed a step ahead, allowing them to dominate large spells of the game.
The difference became even more visible as the match progressed. Japan maintained their tempo and intensity for the full ninety minutes, while India struggled to keep up with the pace and movement.
This physical gap made it difficult for India to close spaces, win second balls or break Japan’s rhythm, ultimately contributing to the one-sided nature of the contest.
For more updates, follow Khel Now on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube; download the Khel Now Android App or IOS App and join our community on Whatsapp & Telegram.
Ayushman Sharma is a sports enthusiast with a deep love for football, following the game closely since 2018. A hardcore supporter of NorthEast United FC and FC Barcelona, he has also gained valuable on-ground experience by volunteering during FIFA World Cup Qualifiers in Guwahati.