Manchester City reach settlement over APT rule with Premier League

(Courtesy : Getty Images)
City took the league to court last year for the implementation of the APT rule.
A resolution regarding the Associated Party Transaction (APT) Rules has been reached between Manchester City and the Premier League.
City have now acknowledged that the present Associated Party Transaction Rules are “valid and binding,” the two parties emphasised. After the Cityzens filed a third lawsuit in February, the deal put an end to the league and club’s legal battle.
City and league reach joint resolution on Associated Party Transaction rules

However, a resolution on the significant financial issue with City, which involves over 100 charges, is still pending and is not anticipated to be reached until at least next month.
A joint-statement from both City and the Premier League reads: “The Premier League and Man City FC have reached a settlement in relation to the arbitration commenced by the club earlier this year concerning the Premier League’s Associated Party Transaction rules and as a result the parties have agreed to terminate the proceedings.”
“This settlement brings an end to the dispute between the parties regarding the rules. As part of the settlement, Manchester City accepts that the current rules are valid and binding.
“It has been agreed that neither the Premier League nor the club will be making any further comment about the matter.”
Insiders think City have won a big battle by holding onto a lucrative new Etihad partnership, even though the same announcements naturally use neutral language.
Although the club will not contest the new regulations, some sources believe that allowing that arrangement amounts to “driving a coach and horses through the rules.”
What is an Associated Party Transaction in the Premier League?
The purpose of the Associated Party Transaction regulations is to stop clubs from negotiating sponsorship agreements with related parties that aren’t thought to be worth their fair market value.
Were City against the Associated Party Transaction rule?
Yes, in June 2024, they took the league to independent arbitration, stating that the rule is unfair and anti-competitive.
What happened to City’s 115 charges?
The 115 charges are unrelated to the current situation.
For more updates, follow Khel Now on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram; download the Khel Now Android App or IOS App and join our community on Telegram.
After earning a bachelor's degree in mass media, Rajarshi began his career as a sports writer in 2019, driven by his passion for sports journalism. He has been working in the field for over six years. A devoted fan of Lionel Messi and Barcelona, Rajarshi has been involved in sports since childhood. Before turning his focus to journalism, he even represented his college at the state level. Along with covering football, he enjoys playing the game, watching movies, and experimenting with new recipes in his spare time, as cooking is one of his favorite hobbies.
- South Africa vs Angola Preview, prediction, lineups, betting tips & odds | AFCON 2025
- IWL 2025-26: Garhwal United FC and Sethu FC kick off with wins; Gokulam Kerala play out draw
- AIFF Executive Committee proposes formation of independent judiciary committees
- Fulham vs Nottingham Forest Preview, prediction, lineups, betting tips & odds | Premier League 2025-26
- AIFF rejects ISL and I-League proposals, sets up committees to resolve top-tier league deadlock
- AFCON 2025: All nations' squad list for Morocco
- Zlatan Ibrahimović names one of Lionel Messi’s sons as his “heir”
- GOD of cricket Sachin Tendulkar meets Lionel Messi, gifts his number '10' jersey at the Wankhede Stadium
- Top nine players Erling Haaland surpassed in Champions League goals; Henry, Rooney & more
- Top three highest bicycle kick goals in football history; Ronaldo, McTominay & more