India forced to continue with injured goalkeeper in SAFF U-20 final penalty shootout  defeat to Bangladesh

Questions have been raised over Suraj Singh’s involvement in the penalty shootout.

India’s heartbreaking defeat to Bangladesh in the SAFF U-20 Championship 2026 final has sparked major debate after goalkeeper Suraj Singh was reportedly forced to continue despite carrying an injury during the match and even through the penalty shootout.

The final, hosted in Malé, Maldives, ended goalless in regulation time before Bangladesh edged India in the shootout to lift the title.

However, the biggest talking point after the match was India’s decision or inability to replace Suraj Singh despite visible discomfort.

Adding further intrigue to the situation, India U-20’s backup goalkeeper, Al Sabith, has reacted via Instagram, raising more questions among fans over why an injured Suraj was made to continue during the penalties.

Suraj Singh requested a substitution

According to reports from the match, Suraj Singh had picked up an injury during the game and was seen repeatedly asking the bench for a change.

The concern grew even more during the penalty shootout, where the India U-20 captain continued between the sticks despite appearing unfit.

For many watching, the immediate question was simple: could India have substituted their goalkeeper during the shootout?

The answer, according to IFAB’s Laws of the Game, is yes — under specific circumstances.

What do the rules say?

Under IFAB Law 10 (Determining the Outcome of a Match), substitutions are generally not allowed during a penalty shootout, except if the goalkeeper is injured or becomes unable to continue.

The law clearly states that an injured goalkeeper may be replaced during kicks from the penalty mark, provided the team still has a substitution opportunity available or is allowed to use a designated substitute for this scenario.

This means the common belief that “you cannot make subs during penalties” is not entirely correct.

The rule specifically includes an exception for the goalkeeper.

A costly moment in a title-deciding match

Penalty shootouts often come down to fine margins, and an injured goalkeeper being unable to dive at full stretch can significantly alter the outcome.

For India, the decision not to replace Suraj Singh could become one of the defining moments of the final.

Bangladesh held their nerve to win the shootout and clinch the SAFF U-20 crown, while India were left to reflect on what might have been.

The laws do allow an injured goalkeeper to be substituted during a shootout, which makes the handling of Suraj Singh’s injury a major post-match talking point.

If India indeed had the option to make the change but did not, this could raise serious questions over the interpretation of the rules in one of the most important moments of the tournament.

For more updates, follow Khel Now on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube; download the Khel Now Android App or IOS App and join our community on Whatsapp & Telegram.