Five controversies that rocked tennis universe in 2023

Former Grand slam winner Simona Halep was banned for doping.

The 2023 tennis season was rife with controversies that overshadowed the on-court performances and became the talk of the town. The season was tainted by incidents such as Simona Halep’s four-year suspension after testing positive for Roxadustat.

The Madrid Open came under fire for not allowing female players to speak to the audience, a situation further complicated by the ‘Cake-gate’ scandal involving unequal birthday cake sizes for Carlos Alcaraz and Aryna Sabalenka. Issues with scheduling and events like the Wimbledon final also made headlines, along with distasteful incidents like Nazi chants.

Here’s a rundown of the top five tennis controversies that shook the world this year:

Simona Halep ban upheld

Simona Halep’s troubles started in 2022 when she was found positive for the prohibited substance Roxadustat in August of that year. A provisional suspension from tennis competitions was imposed on her two months afterward. Due to inconsistencies in her Athlete Biological Passport (ABP), she received a four-year ban in September this year.

The winner of two Grand Slam titles has refuted the voluntary intake of the substance. She has lodged an appeal against the decision with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The CAS is scheduled to hear the appeal of the 32-year-old in February 2024. If the CAS confirms the ban, it could signify the termination of her tennis career.

Women’s doubles players not allowed to speak to fans at Madrid Open

The Madrid Open was embroiled in controversy when the female players were denied the chance to speak to the audience, a privilege that was not withheld from their male counterparts. Following the women’s doubles final, where Azarenka and Beatriz Haddad Maia triumphed over Jessica Pegula and Coco Gauff, both teams were prohibited from addressing the spectators.

Another contentious issue, dubbed as ‘Cake-gate’, arose when the organizers gave Carlos Alcaraz and Aryna Sabalenka cakes of varying sizes. Interestingly, both players were celebrating their birthdays during the tournament.

Concurrent scheduling issues throughout the year

In the world of tennis, scheduling conflicts are an unavoidable reality that often lead to clashes between different tournaments. This puts players in a challenging position, forcing them to decide which event to participate in. Even within a single tournament, scheduling dilemmas can arise, potentially impacting the players’ performance and rankings.

The Billie Jean King Cup commenced just two days after the conclusion of the WTA Finals. This tight scheduling can be detrimental to the players’ performance. Another instance of scheduling mishap involved Jannik Sinner, who had to withdraw from the Paris Masters due to a demanding schedule. He was expected to play again merely 15 hours after finishing his second-round match. These examples highlight the potential adverse effects of scheduling issues on players’ performance and rankings.

Novak Djokovic smashes racket at Wimbledon incurs $8,000 fine

In an intense Wimbledon final, the reigning champion Djokovic was not at his best. Djokovic’s frustration was evident when his strategy failed to produce the expected outcome. His adversary, Carlos Alcaraz, emerged victorious in the thrilling five-set final, securing his maiden Wimbledon men’s singles championship.

Alcaraz managed to recover from an initial setback to triumph 1-6 7-6 (8-6) 6-1 3-6 6-4 over the defending champion. Djokovic’s anger flared up during the match, resulting in a penalty of $8,000 for smashing the racket on the net post.

Fan ejected from US Open for singing phrase associated with Nazis 

During the US Open, a spectator was ejected following an incident where they sang a phrase associated with the Nazis. This was brought to light by German tennis player Alexander Zverev during his fourth-round match against Italy’s Jannik Sinner at Arthur Ashe Stadium. Zverev reported the fan’s inappropriate conduct to the chair umpire.

The controversial phrase, “Deutschland über alles,” meaning “Germany above all,” was initially part of the anthem promoting unity. However, during the Nazi regime, it was misused to signify Nazi supremacy. Following the end of the war, this line was eliminated from the anthem due to its altered connotation.

For more updates, follow Khel Now on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram; download the Khel Now Android App or IOS App and join our community on Whatsapp & Telegram